Thursday, June 09, 2005
Democrats Hate White Christians
"I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for," former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean told Democrats gathered at a Manhattan hotel, in quotes picked up by the New York Daily News. Jan. 29, 2005
Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean on Wednesday defended his recent harsh criticism of Republicans, including his observation that they are "pretty much a white, Christian party." June 8, 2005
Connect the dots and you see where the Democratic Party stands.
And if you don't think Dean's comments represent the Democratic party, then why is Senator Biden saying this:
"A lot of the things he (Howard Dean) does say, I agree with. But you know, he has a style that's a different style than mine, and he has views that are slightly different than mine. Only slightly. He's basically right on the stuff."
I guess non-white Christians can take comfort in the fact that the Democratic Party doesn't hate them, it only panders to them. Why, in Heaven's name, does anyone vote Democrat these days?
Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean on Wednesday defended his recent harsh criticism of Republicans, including his observation that they are "pretty much a white, Christian party." June 8, 2005
Connect the dots and you see where the Democratic Party stands.
And if you don't think Dean's comments represent the Democratic party, then why is Senator Biden saying this:
"A lot of the things he (Howard Dean) does say, I agree with. But you know, he has a style that's a different style than mine, and he has views that are slightly different than mine. Only slightly. He's basically right on the stuff."
I guess non-white Christians can take comfort in the fact that the Democratic Party doesn't hate them, it only panders to them. Why, in Heaven's name, does anyone vote Democrat these days?
Thursday, May 26, 2005
Newsflash to MSM: Terrorists Trained to Lie!!
Feel free to cut and paste this in your blog, or send it to your favorite MSM outlet. Direct to you from the Al Qaeda training manual - Lesson Eighteen (on Pages 16 and 17 of this link):
IF AN INDICTMENT IS ISSUED AND THE TRIAL, BEGINS, THE BROTHER HAS TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. At the beginning of the trial, once more the brothers must insist on proving that torture was inflicted on them by State Security [investigators] before the judge.
2. Complain [to the court] of mistreatment while in prison.
3. Make arrangements for the brother?s defense with the attorney, whether he was retained by the brother?s family or court-appointed.
4. The brother has to do his best to know the names of the state security officers, who participated in his torture and mention their names to the judge. [These names may be obtained from brothers who had to deal with those officers in previous cases.]
5. Some brothers may tell and may be lured by the state security investigators to testify against the brothers [i.e. affirmation witness], either by not keeping them together in the same prison during the trials, or by letting them talk to the media. In this case, they have to be treated gently, and should be offered good advice, good treatment, and pray that God may guide them.
6. During the trial, the court has to be notified of any mistreatment of the brothers inside the prison.
PRISONS AND DETENTION CENTERS
IF AN INDICTMENT IS ISSUED AND THE TRIAL, BEGINS, THE BROTHER HAS TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. At the beginning of the trial, once more the brothers must insist on proving that torture was inflicted on them by State Security [investigators] before the judge.
2. Complain [to the court] of mistreatment while in prison.
3. Make arrangements for the brother?s defense with the attorney, whether he was retained by the brother?s family or court-appointed.
4. The brother has to do his best to know the names of the state security officers, who participated in his torture and mention their names to the judge. [These names may be obtained from brothers who had to deal with those officers in previous cases.]
5. Some brothers may tell and may be lured by the state security investigators to testify against the brothers [i.e. affirmation witness], either by not keeping them together in the same prison during the trials, or by letting them talk to the media. In this case, they have to be treated gently, and should be offered good advice, good treatment, and pray that God may guide them.
6. During the trial, the court has to be notified of any mistreatment of the brothers inside the prison.
Media Bias? What Media Bias?
From the Drudge Report:
'LAW & ORDER' TIES JUDGE KILLER TO DELAY FAN; CONGRESSMAN PLANS COMPLAINT'
Hollywood once again jumps into bitter DC politics when an episode of NBC's LAW & ORDER: CRIMINAL INTENT suggests a judge killer would wear a 'Tom DeLay' T-Shirt!
The House Majority Leader plans a letter of protest later this afternoon, congressional sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT. Wednesday night's episode centered on the murder of a judge. "Maybe we should put out and APB for somebody in a Tom DeLay T-Shirt," declares a character during the drama.
TRANSCRIPT OF EPISODE 'FALSE-HEARTED JUDGES': In the season finale, Detectives Goren and Eames suspect an imprisoned white supremacist is behind the shootings of a judge's family, but their investigation widens when an appellate judge is later murdered... ADA RON CARVER (COURTNEY B. VANCE) : An african-american judge, an appellate court judge, no less.
MAN: Chief of DS is setting up a task force. People are talking about multiple assassination teams.
DET. ALEX EAMES (KATHRYN ERBE): Looks like the same shooters. CSU found the slug in a post, matched it to the one that killed Judge Barton. Maybe we should put out an APB for somebody in a Tom DeLay T-Shirt.
'LAW & ORDER' TIES JUDGE KILLER TO DELAY FAN; CONGRESSMAN PLANS COMPLAINT'
Hollywood once again jumps into bitter DC politics when an episode of NBC's LAW & ORDER: CRIMINAL INTENT suggests a judge killer would wear a 'Tom DeLay' T-Shirt!
The House Majority Leader plans a letter of protest later this afternoon, congressional sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT. Wednesday night's episode centered on the murder of a judge. "Maybe we should put out and APB for somebody in a Tom DeLay T-Shirt," declares a character during the drama.
TRANSCRIPT OF EPISODE 'FALSE-HEARTED JUDGES': In the season finale, Detectives Goren and Eames suspect an imprisoned white supremacist is behind the shootings of a judge's family, but their investigation widens when an appellate judge is later murdered... ADA RON CARVER (COURTNEY B. VANCE) : An african-american judge, an appellate court judge, no less.
MAN: Chief of DS is setting up a task force. People are talking about multiple assassination teams.
DET. ALEX EAMES (KATHRYN ERBE): Looks like the same shooters. CSU found the slug in a post, matched it to the one that killed Judge Barton. Maybe we should put out an APB for somebody in a Tom DeLay T-Shirt.
Democrats Lie About Increasing Abortion Rates
FactCheck.org exposes the Democrats lie about abortions increasing under the Bush Administraton. Check it out and spread the word.
Friday, May 20, 2005
Boxers or Briefs?
Now we know...but did we care? (Go to the Drudge Report home page before this priceless image disappears).
The Blood Lust of the MSM Continues
According to the Drudge Report, the NY Times is planning on running a 6,000 word article describing the "brutal details of 2 Afghan inmates deaths" over two years ago. The release of this article now, on the heels of the Newsweek NEWSFLUSH, highlights the total lack of sensitivity of the MSM to the potential impact of this story on the Muslim world and the safety of our troops in the Middle East (and the anti-war, liberal Democrats keep chanting "we support our troops"). The writing style of this piece comes across as a poor attempt from a failed romance novelist...you know, the ones who try to make up a flowery story about some incident that happened in their lives. The fact that "last October, the Army's Criminal Investigation Command concluded that there was probable cause to charge 27 officers and enlisted personnel with criminal offenses in the Dilawar case ranging from dereliction of duty to maiming and involuntary manslaughter. Fifteen of the same soldiers were also cited for probable criminal responsibility in the Habibullah case..." (i.e., the Army was already investigating these incidents) was incidental. The Army is not moving fast enough to prosecute these individuals, according to the NY Times, so now is the time to release this story to further inflame passions in the Middle East and get some more people killed!
The rags that print these stories are so blindly anti-US, anti-military and anti-Bush that I cannot even remotely believe that they "cannot see the forest for the trees". They still think that they're living in the Vietnam era and their job is to bring an end to what they consider is an unjust war, regardless of the cost in human lives, US or otherwise. Why else would the president of the 35,000-member Newspaper Guild (Linda Foley) assert U.S. troops deliberately are killing journalists in Iraq. Here is the statement from this poor excuse of a journalist:
According to a tape of her remarks, Foley said: "Journalists, by the way, are not just being targeted verbally or … ah, or … ah, politically. They are also being targeted for real, um … in places like Iraq. What outrages me as a representative of journalists is that there's not more outrage about the number, and the brutality, and the cavalier nature of the U.S. military toward the killing of journalists in Iraq."
Foley continued, "They target and kill journalists … uh, from other countries, particularly Arab countries like Al -, like Arab news services like al-Jazeera, for example. They actually target them and blow up their studios with impunity. ..."
Naturally, she presented absolutely no evidence to support her claims.
We know, and are fighting, the enemy in the Middle East. It's the enemy within that worries me.
The rags that print these stories are so blindly anti-US, anti-military and anti-Bush that I cannot even remotely believe that they "cannot see the forest for the trees". They still think that they're living in the Vietnam era and their job is to bring an end to what they consider is an unjust war, regardless of the cost in human lives, US or otherwise. Why else would the president of the 35,000-member Newspaper Guild (Linda Foley) assert U.S. troops deliberately are killing journalists in Iraq. Here is the statement from this poor excuse of a journalist:
According to a tape of her remarks, Foley said: "Journalists, by the way, are not just being targeted verbally or … ah, or … ah, politically. They are also being targeted for real, um … in places like Iraq. What outrages me as a representative of journalists is that there's not more outrage about the number, and the brutality, and the cavalier nature of the U.S. military toward the killing of journalists in Iraq."
Foley continued, "They target and kill journalists … uh, from other countries, particularly Arab countries like Al -, like Arab news services like al-Jazeera, for example. They actually target them and blow up their studios with impunity. ..."
Naturally, she presented absolutely no evidence to support her claims.
We know, and are fighting, the enemy in the Middle East. It's the enemy within that worries me.
Thursday, May 12, 2005
Still Too Late for Terri
...and here's another reason why the Florida courts should not have starved Terri Schiavo to death...
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
Too Late for Terri
This is why the Florida courts should not have starved Terri Schiavo to death...
Wednesday, April 27, 2005
Liberals No Longer Content With Throwing Food
Well, the saga continues. In my post from 1 April 2005 (Who Fired the First Shot?), I noted how liberals were turning the Terry Schiavo case into a diatribe against Conservative Christians, complaining that their strong "right-to-life" position was going to result in violence against the judiciary, much as Bill Clinton blamed Rush Limbaugh and Conservative talk radio for the Oklahoma City bombing. In that post, I pointed out that it's been the liberals who have been firing the shots (in the form of food) at numerous Conservative speakers (Buchanan, Coulter, etc.).
Apparently, the liberals feel that they're not getting their message out with enough emphasis. The Drudge Report is reporting that Air America, that noble bastion of liberal talk radio, has run a radio spot against President Bush's Social Security plan which includes gunshots. ""What is with all the killing?" said host Randi Rhodes, laughing, after the clip aired. There is no question as to who the intended target is, and the Government is investigating.
UPDATE I: I see that the Drudge Report now indicates that Ms. Rhodes has apologized for the skit. See what the threat of a Secret Service investigation will do for you? Take it for what it's worth but, to me, this apology is as meaningful as Sandy Berger apologizing for making an "honest mistake" in removing and destroying classified documents from the National Archives. If the liberals have any sense of decency or patriotism, Air America will fire her on the spot (but I'm not holding my breath). I wonder when/if the MSM will report on this?
Apparently, the liberals feel that they're not getting their message out with enough emphasis. The Drudge Report is reporting that Air America, that noble bastion of liberal talk radio, has run a radio spot against President Bush's Social Security plan which includes gunshots. ""What is with all the killing?" said host Randi Rhodes, laughing, after the clip aired. There is no question as to who the intended target is, and the Government is investigating.
UPDATE I: I see that the Drudge Report now indicates that Ms. Rhodes has apologized for the skit. See what the threat of a Secret Service investigation will do for you? Take it for what it's worth but, to me, this apology is as meaningful as Sandy Berger apologizing for making an "honest mistake" in removing and destroying classified documents from the National Archives. If the liberals have any sense of decency or patriotism, Air America will fire her on the spot (but I'm not holding my breath). I wonder when/if the MSM will report on this?
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
The Truth About the Dems' Social Security Message
Check out this article at FactCheck.org to get the "truth" behind the Democrats' Social Security Message and spread the word:
"Democrats harness false assumptions to generate projections that individual Social Security accounts would be losers."
It's getting harder and harder to believe anything that comes out of the mouths of the Democrats these days or to trust their motives.
"Democrats harness false assumptions to generate projections that individual Social Security accounts would be losers."
It's getting harder and harder to believe anything that comes out of the mouths of the Democrats these days or to trust their motives.
